Quantcast
Channel: KVR Audio
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2792

Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) • Re: The bs of Pro DAWs Vs amateur DAWs

$
0
0
If you would actually read what I wrote instead of just waiting to throw the next bogus argument at me to "win" you would have read that I was talking about the sound, not the music. You can create (at least theoretically) complex music with trackers but the sound is very limited. That's why you have to trick and adapt the music itself. That limited sound is okay if you go for that oldschool lo-fi vibe (as I already wrote). But you can't go beyond that. Is it really that hard to understand that you can drive a car as slow as a bike but a bike never as fast as a car? Just to make sure: The bike stands for trackers, the car for "big" DAWs.
See this is the problem, you literally don't know what you're talking about. Modern Trackers can use VSTi's, AUi's even. There is no difference in "sound". People are choosing Lofi etc. Someone posted Venetian Snares earlier in this thread. He's using orchestral samples, the whole bit. All in Renoise.

So there you go, in terms of composing, you admit they're capable, and because almost all modern trackers can use any VST or AU, there is no "sound". Just give it up, it was always a weird point.

Statistics: Posted by machinesworking — Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:48 am



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2792

Trending Articles