No, the grass is not greener elsewhere, quite the contrary.
the choice of a daw is really a personal choice, depending on what you expect from its workflow, ergonomics, way of working, organization, etc...
Studio One for my part, is moving away from my expectations, on the other hand Cubase, even if not easy given the number of years of its creation, is slowly but surely returning to the position of my preferences, hence my choice.
Cubase is on the right path, even if it will still take a long time to achieve optimal results, but most importantly it is progressing.
I used Live 11 Suite, it was my main DAW.
For my part, always had a CPU load that was way too high, despite all the settings and optimization required.
For some inexplicable reason, after the Windows 11 update, it was magical for Cubase Pro 13.
Different and much better CPU management.
Coming back to live 11, beyond the concern of the CPU load, I realized that my way of composing and organizing myself was more favorable on a classic DAW.
Why I chose Cubase Pro 13.
What is really missing, however, is a dedicated controller like the CC 121.
That's really a concern for me.
There is the faderport v2, the x touch one, ssl uf1, but you have to add scripts and even if these are excellent and a big thank you to the developers of these scripts, I prefer a dedicated controller and native functional.
Even scripts do not always give access to all the functions, even if once again they are of immense help for operation.
All this to say that I am very happy with my choice for my daw.
If I needed a clip launcher, I would without a doubt take Waveform Pro 13, very sufficient for my use and what's more, version 13 seems to be much more stable and also a nice development.
Congratulations to the developers for a superb job.
Live cannot be compared with Cubase, Studio One, not really the same operating philosophy.
Starting with the clip launcher function.
The linear part of Live not yet at the level of Cubase, Studio One, personal opinion of course.
the choice of a daw is really a personal choice, depending on what you expect from its workflow, ergonomics, way of working, organization, etc...
Studio One for my part, is moving away from my expectations, on the other hand Cubase, even if not easy given the number of years of its creation, is slowly but surely returning to the position of my preferences, hence my choice.
Cubase is on the right path, even if it will still take a long time to achieve optimal results, but most importantly it is progressing.
I used Live 11 Suite, it was my main DAW.
For my part, always had a CPU load that was way too high, despite all the settings and optimization required.
For some inexplicable reason, after the Windows 11 update, it was magical for Cubase Pro 13.
Different and much better CPU management.
Coming back to live 11, beyond the concern of the CPU load, I realized that my way of composing and organizing myself was more favorable on a classic DAW.
Why I chose Cubase Pro 13.
What is really missing, however, is a dedicated controller like the CC 121.
That's really a concern for me.
There is the faderport v2, the x touch one, ssl uf1, but you have to add scripts and even if these are excellent and a big thank you to the developers of these scripts, I prefer a dedicated controller and native functional.
Even scripts do not always give access to all the functions, even if once again they are of immense help for operation.
All this to say that I am very happy with my choice for my daw.
If I needed a clip launcher, I would without a doubt take Waveform Pro 13, very sufficient for my use and what's more, version 13 seems to be much more stable and also a nice development.
Congratulations to the developers for a superb job.
Live cannot be compared with Cubase, Studio One, not really the same operating philosophy.
Starting with the clip launcher function.
The linear part of Live not yet at the level of Cubase, Studio One, personal opinion of course.
Statistics: Posted by Trancer — Sat Apr 13, 2024 5:53 am